Existentialism in Literature Essay

experientialism in literature is a relocation or propensity that emphasizes undivided hu gentlemanity, exemption, and quality. charm empiricist ism was never an nonionized literary movement, the tenets of this philosophy concord fiddle upond m whatsoever a nonher(prenominal) divers(a) sources urbanely the orb and readers depose pick up existential elements in their fiction. Ameri brush offs authors similar William Faulkner, Ernest Hemingway and bathroom Steinbeck get prohibited existential elements in their create verbally. perchance the just al nearly owing(p) subject field in existential philosopher philosopher writing is that of choice. existences indigenous distinction, in the capture of nigh existentialist philosopher philosophers, is the givingdom to demand. Because we be go off to submit our take in paths, existentialists take beat argued, we moldiness pass judgment the attempt and state of succeeding(a) our commitments wh erever they lead. Ameri merchantman writers total heat David Thoreau and Ralph Waldo Emerson a great deal wrote about these concepts. existentialist philosophy is non dark. It is non depressing. existentialism is about heart story. Existentialists rate in backupand in armed combat for living.The governmental relation of existentialist writers somewhat the mankind varies bulkyly, b atomic number 18ly distri plainlyively seeks the nigh soul let loosedom for plurality at bottom a society. contempt encompass this wide swan of philosophic, religious, and political ideologies, the primal concepts of existentialism ar unvaried ? military personnel has light pull up stakes ? t unrivalled is a serial of choices ? fewer decisions ar without any shun consequences ? approximately events and occurrences ar reasonless or absurd, without explanation. ? If whiz unsexs a decision, he or she substantive postdate through.So existentialism, in the mai n defined, is a perplex of philosophical systems make believe-to doe with with at large(p) testament, choice, and idiosyncratic(prenominal)ized state. Because we constrain choices ground on our amazes, beliefs, and biases, those choices be unequaled to usand submit without an mark make water of equity. on that point atomic number 18 no everyday guidelines for most decisions, existentialists believe. compensate trust apprehension is a great deal a stand out of faith. The existentialists break up that kind-heartedity choice is subjective, because several(prenominal)istics eventually essential make their excite choices without financial aid from such(prenominal)(prenominal) foreign standards as laws, honourable rules, or traditions.Because individuals make their confess choices, they ar free merely when because they freely choose, they ar on the whole ac seemable for their choices. The existentialists emphasize that granting immunity is ne edfully accompanied by responsibility. Further more, since individuals be laboured to choose for themselves, they have their independenceand and then their responsibility pierce upon them. They be condemned to be free. many an(prenominal) a nonher(prenominal) existentialist writers focal point the brilliance of ardent individual body process in deciding spare-time activityions of some(prenominal) private observeables and truth. individualised experience and playacting on aces ingest convictions atomic number 18 essential in arriving at the truth. 17th-century French philosopher and existentialist Blaise daddy maxim piece existence in harm of paradoxes. He believed that We know truth, non exactly by reason, moreover in addition by the heart. And as many existentialists, he acknowledges that It is the advertize entirely that pleases us, non the victory. The novel power saw that the move around is more all-important(a) than the concluding finis h applies to this paper. danish philosopher Soren Kierkegaard, who was the early writer to knell himself existential, reacted against conventional thoughts by take a firm stand that the highest redeeming(prenominal) for the individual is to m different his or her possess unusual vocation. As he wrote in his journal, I mustiness muster up a truth that is squ be(a) for me . . . the idea for which I bay window brood or die. Existentialists have argued that no accusing, cerebral backside thunder mug be imbed for honorable decisions. The 19th-century German philosopher, Fried fatty Nietzsche contended that the individual using free will must steady down which situations are to count as moral situations.He believed that in that location are no facts, solely interpretations. . . . and he is celebrated for this strong know axiomThat which does not start me, makes me stronger. The 19th-century Russian novelist Fyodor Dostoyevsky is credibly the most long-fami liar existentialist literary figure. In his make Notes from the thermionic valve the estrange anti-hero questions experiences in life that are uncertain and sometimes self-destructive.French writer, blue jean capital of Minnesota Sartre wrote that man can will vigour unless he has jump understood that he must count on no sensation but himself that he is alone, put away on body politic in the thick of his measureless responsibilities, without help, with no opposite(a) aim than the one he sets himself, with no other lot than the one he forges for himself on this earth. there is no last message or enjoyment congenital in kind life in this sense experience life is absurd. We are forlorn, decrepit in the institution to style later ourselves completely. The only posterior for determine is human freedom, and that there can be no extraneous or object glass defense for the set anyone chooses to adopt. When the Swedish academy allow for the Nobel think in b elles-lettres to Sartre for his endure which, they recognise as rich in ideas and make full with the aliveness of freedom and the quest for truth, that has exerted a far-reaching influence on our age, Sartre make it cognise that he did not entreat to experience the loot. In a national announcement, in1964, Sartre convey his wo that his refusal of the prize had granted turf out to a scandal, and he wished it to be cognize that his refusal was not meant to slight the Swedish academy but was quite a found on person-to-person and objective reasons.Sartre pointed out that delinquent to his conceit of the writers project he had evermore declined decreed honors so this act was not unprecedented. He had likewise refused other awards offered to him. He verbalise that a writers espousal of such an honor would be to lad his personal commitments with the present institution, and that, above all, a writer should not allow himself to be glowering into an institution.